Target Solubility Tool
- 1 Overview
- 2 Redox Active Material Design Space
- 3 Using the RFB Dashboard
- 4 Description of Input Parameters
- 5 References
Redox flow batteries (RFBs) provide a promising pathway towards low-cost grid-scale energy storage devices. The economic viability of non-aqueous and aqueous redox flow batteries (NAqRFBs and AqRFBs respectively) is highly dependent on electroactive materials, salt, and solvent choices. The interactive RFB Dashboard can be used to select redox active materials for use in nonaqueous and aqueous RFBs by displaying individual materials along with regions of economic viability defined by the target battery price and minimum redox active species concentration. In addition, the tool provides concentration targets for redox active materials achieving the target battery price. This tool can be used to analyze both experimentally demonstrated materials and simulated families of materials. Reference 2 describes the techno-economic model implemented in the present tool. The default values of all input parameters are assumed to be the median values presented in Ref. 1.
Redox Active Material Design Space
Redox active materials are defined using three electrochemical properties: molecular weight (g/mol e-), redox potential (V vs. Li/Li+), and active material concentration (mol actives/kg electrolyte). The molecular weight is defined as the molecular weight of redox active material normalized by the number of electrons transferred. The redox potential is defined as the average potential of electron transfer events that the material undergoes.
The molecular weight and redox potential of a redox active molecule can be measured or simulated in less time and with more accuracy than active material solubility. Thus, the RFB Dashboard shows redox active materials on a two-dimensional materials-selection map, with axes of molecular weight and redox potential, while drawing concentration contours that achieves the target battery price. In the model each material is assumed to pair with a hypothetical counter-electrode material having a different potential than the material of interest, but common concentration and molecular weight.
Using the RFB Dashboard
Importing Data for analysis
Data can be imported into the tool via a Comma Separated Values (CSV) file. The CSV file should be formatted in such a way that there is a header for the first row of the data sheet and the order of the data columns does not matter. However, the header names for each column has to have 'formula' for molecular formula, 'ew' for equivalent weight, 'redpot' for reduction potential and 'oxpot' for oxidation potential. Once your CSV file is ready, it can be uploaded into the tool by clicking on the "via CSV" button on top of the tool to upload the file and the data will then be displayed on the tool.
This should be updated with "ew" changed to "mw"
Via Molecule Explorer
Data can also be imported into the tool via Molecule Explorer. By clicking on the "via Molecule Explorer" button on top of the RFB Dashboard, the Molecule Explorer would appear and materials with desired structures can be selected. Once the molecules data set are selected, click on the "Explore Solubility" button to import them into the RFB Dashboard for further analysis. For a visual tutorial on how to import data via Molecule Explorer, a short video is available to demonstrate how the Molecule Explorer is used.
Description of Input Parameters
Target Battery Price
The maximum battery price for RFBs built using the redox active materials enclosed by the concentration contours. The battery price is a combination of reactor cost, electrolyte cost, balance-of-plant and addition-to-price costs. Battery price neglects the cost of power-conditioning equipment that is included in system price defined in Ref. 1. As a result, when calculating battery price balance-of-plant costs are reduced by $100/kW compared to that in Ref. 1 used to calculate system price. ($/kWh)
The minimum concentration achieving the target battery price for redox active materials enclosed by the concentration contours. The molality is defined as a ratio of moles of redox active species to kilograms of solvent in mol/kg.
- Reactor Cost Per Unit Area ($/m2)
- Salt Cost: cost per unit mass of supporting salt ($/kg)
- Solvent Cost: cost per unit mass of solvent ($/kg)
- Active Material Cost: cost per unit mass of active material ($/kg)
- Additional Contribution to Price: accounts for depreciation, labor, overhead, and margin ($/kW)
- Balance of Plant Cost: accounts for ancillary equipment costs ($/kW)
- System Discharge Time: battery discharge time (hours)
- Depth of Discharge: allowable range of state-of-charge (-)
- Discharge Voltage Efficiency: ratio of cell potential during cycling to the thermodynamically reversible open-circuit cell potential (-)
- Round-trip Coulombic Efficiency: ratio of charge released during discharging cycle to charge stored during charging cycle (-)
- Discharge System Efficiency: accounts for auxiliary equipment losses during discharge (-)
- Area-Specific Resistance: accounts for ohmic, kinetic, and transport losses in the separator, electrodes, and electrolyte (Ω-cm2)
- Stability Limits: solvent window of stability beyond which breakdown occurs (V vs. Li/Li+)
- Hypothetical Counter-Electrode Potential: Assumed hypothetical counter-electrode for full-cell analysis of single electrode materials. (V vs. Li/Li+)
- R. M. Darling, K. G. Gallagher, J. A. Kowalski, S. Ha, and F. R. Brushett, Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 3459-3477 (2014)
- R. Dmello, J. D. Milshtein, F. R. Brushett, and K. C. Smith, In Review (2016)